🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.