🔗 Share this article

At the time the software corporation announced a substantial price increase for its productivity software, customers were reportedly offered a limited choice: either agree to the increased fee with artificial intelligence tools or cancel their subscription.

According to Australia's consumer watchdog, the company supposedly failed to disclose a alternative choice that allowed customers to keep accessing the software at the previous cost excluding the artificial intelligence feature, known as Copilot.

Legal Proceedings Launched by Oversight Body

Australia's primary consumer protection agency has brought the technology company to federal court, claiming that the firm misled around 2.7 million local individual and household plan customers.

The ACCC asserts that messages distributed to users only described two options: paying the increased fee or ending the service.

It is claimed that the company's emails and blog post were false or misleading, suggesting that customers must agree to the costlier AI-included subscriptions, while the sole alternative choice was to discontinue, the head of the commission, Gina Cass-Gottlieb, said.

Hidden Alternative Discovered

The oversight body claims that a third option, known as standard subscriptions, existed but was not disclosed from customers.

This particular plan allowed users to retain the features of their current subscription without Copilot at the previous reduced cost.

Consumers were solely presented with this alternative when they started terminating their subscription, according to the commission.

Cost Hikes and Customer Impact

Yearly subscription price for the Microsoft 365 individual subscription increased by 45% from $109 AUD to $159 AUD with the AI tool included.

The family plan experienced a 29% increase, jumping from $139 to $179 AUD per year.

Microsoft informed automatically renewing customers about the AI inclusion and pending cost adjustment through a couple of messages and a online article.

It will be claimed in the legal proceeding that Microsoft intentionally omitted mention to the standard options in its notifications and concealed their existence until subsequent to customers initiated the cancellation process to increase the number of consumers on higher-priced Copilot-integrated subscriptions, Cass-Gottlieb continued.

Essential Tools and Few Alternatives

Productivity applications featured in 365 subscriptions are essential in many people's daily activities, and given there are limited substitutes to the bundled package, terminating may not have been a practical option for users.

Consumers could have chosen the standard subscription if they had been informed of all the viable choices, as stated by the regulator.

Investigation and Possible Consequences

The ACCC's inquiry relied on a large quantity of user complaints as well as digital discussions from sites such as Reddit.

The ACCC is pursuing directives comprising fines, injunctions, formal statements, customer compensation and expenses.

The maximum penalty could be the greater of $50m, triple the overall gains acquired, or 30% of the company's adjusted turnover during the violation period.

Company Response

Customer confidence and openness are top priorities for the organization, and we are examining the commission's claim in depth, a Microsoft spokesperson stated.

We continue to be committed to working constructively with the oversight body and ensuring our procedures comply with all regulatory and moral requirements.